Convergence ca be defined in many different ways. In this post, we study the most popular way to define convergence by a metric. Note that knowledge about metric spaces is a prerequisite.
In order to define other types of convergence (e.g. point-wise convergence of functions) one needs to extend the following approach based on open sets. This, however, is not in scope of this post.
Limits of a Sequence
In this section, we apply our knowledge about metrics, open and closed sets to limits. We thereby restrict ourselves to the basics of limits. Refer to [1] for further details.
Let denote a metric space. If the metric is not specified, we assume that the standard Euclidean metric is assigned.
Definition 3.1 (Sequence):
A sequence in is a function from
to
by assigning a value
to each natural number
. The set
is called sequence of
. The elements of
are called terms of the sequence.
Sequences in are called real number sequences. Sequences in
,
are called real tuple sequences. Note that latter definition is simply a generalization since number sequences are, of course,
-tuple sequences with
.
Let be a
-tuple sequence in
equipped with property
. Property
holds for almost all terms of
if there is some
such that
is true for infinitely many of the terms
with
.
Note that a sequence can be considered as a function with domain . We need to distinguish this from functions that map sequences to corresponding function values. Latter concept is very closely related to continuity at a point.
Sequences are, basically, countably many (– or higher-dimensional) vectors arranged in an ordered set that may or may not exhibit certain patterns.
Example 3.1:
a) The sequence can be written as
and is nothing but a function
defined by
.



b) Let us now consider the sequence that can be denoted by
. The range of the function only comprises two real figures
.
c) Now, let us consider the sequence . Here, each natural
is mapped on itself.
d) Consider , that can also be written as
.


e) Consider the 2-tuple sequence in
.


We might think that some of the above examples contain patterns of vectors (e.g. number) that are “getting close” to some other vector (e.g. number). Other sequences may not give us that impression. We are interested in what the long-term behavior of the sequence is:
- What happens for large values of
?
- Does the sequence approach a (real) vector/number?
Note that it is not necessary for a convergent sequence to actually reach its limit. It is only important that the sequence can get arbitrarily close to its limit.
Convergence of a Sequence
Now, let us try to formalize our heuristic thoughts about a sequence approaching a number arbitrarily close by employing mathematical terms.
By writing
(1)
we mean that for every real number there is an integer
, such that
(2)
whenever . A sequence
that fulfills this requirement is called convergent. We can illustrate that on the real line using balls (i.e. open intervals) as follows.
Note that represents an open ball
centered at the convergence point or limit x. For instance, for
we have the following situation, that all points (i.e. an infinite number) smaller than
lie within the open ball
. Those points are sketched smaller than the ones outside of the open ball
.
Accordingly, a real number sequence is convergent if the absolute amount is getting arbitrarily close to some (potentially unknown) number , i.e. if there is an integer
such that
whenever
.
Convergence actually means that the corresponding sequence gets as close as it is desired without actually reaching its limit. Hence, it might be that the limit of the sequence
is not defined at
but it has to be defined in a neighborhood of
.
This limit process conveys the intuitive idea that can be made arbitrarily close to
provided that
is sufficiently large. “Arbitrarily close to the limit
” can also be reflected by corresponding open balls
, where the radius
needs to be adjusted accordingly.
The sequence can also be considered as a function defined by
with
(3)
whenever .
If there is no such , the sequence
is said to diverge. Please note that it also important in what space the process is considered. It might be that a sequence is heading to a number that is not in the range of the sequence (i.e. not part of the considered space). For instance, the sequence Example 3.1 a) converges in
to 0, however, fails to converge in the set of all positive real numbers (excluding zero).
The definition of convergence implies that if and only if
. The convergence of the sequence
to 0 takes place in the standard Euclidean metric space
.
While a sequence in a metric space
does not need to converge, if
its limit is unique. Notice, that a ‘detour’ via another convergence point
(triangle property) would turn out to be the direct path with respect to the metric as
.
A convergent sequence is also bounded. We can prove this intuitive statement by setting
. Hence, it exists a
, such that
for all
. This implies
(4)
for all . Let
for
then the assertion
follows immediately.
Let us re-consider Example 3.1, where the sequence a) apparently converges towards . Sequence b) instead is alternating between
and
and, hence, does not converge. Note that example b) is a bounded sequence that is not convergent. Sequence c) does not have a limit in
as it is growing towards
and is therefore not bounded. However, sequence d) converges towards 1. Finally, 2-tuple sequence e) converges to the vector
.
If we consider one of the converging examples carefully, we will notice that we can chose an arbitrarily small and we will find a correspondingly large
, such that
with
.
For instance, let us define to be
in Example 3.1 a). Then, we can set
and
provided that
.
A sequence is called increasing if
for all
. If an increasing sequence is bounded above, then
converges to the supremum
of its range.
If you want to get a deeper understanding of converging sequences, the second part (i.e. Level II) of the following video by Mathologer is recommended.
Cauchy Sequences
If a sequence converges to a limit
, its terms must ultimately become close to its limit
and hence close to each other. That is, two arbitrary terms
and
of a convergent sequence
become closer and closer to each other provided that the index of both are sufficiently large.
Theorem 3.1 (Convergent and Cauchy Sequences):
Assume that converges in a metric space
to a limit
. Then for every real
there is an integer
such that
Proof: is the limit of
, i.e.
. Assume
is given. Due to the fact that
, we can choose an integer
, such that
for all
. If
is valid, we can conclude
by employing the triangle inequality of the metric.
The last proposition proved that two terms of a convergent sequence becomes arbitrarily close to each other. This property was used by Cauchy to construct the real number system by adding new points to a metric space until it is ‘completed‘. Sequences that fulfill this property are called Cauchy sequence.
Definition 3.2 (Cauchy Sequence):
A sequence is called Cauchy sequence, if the following condition holds true:
(5)
Note that all pairs of terms with index greater than need to get close together. It is not sufficient to require that two consecutive terms get close together.
In the following example, we consider the function and sequences that are interpreted as attributes of this function. If we consider the points of the domain and the function values of the range, we get two sequences that correspond to each other via the function. This concept is closely related to continuity.
Example 3.2 (Non-Complete Space):
If we consider embedded in
such that symbols such as
and
can be interpreted and used. The letter
is assumed to represent a rational number in this example.



Considering the sequence in
shows that the actual limit
is not contained in
.
Hence, a key question is:
- What condition on a sequence of numbers is necessary and sufficient for the sequence to converge to a limit but does not explicitly involve the limit?
If we already knew the limit in advance, the answer would be trivial. In general, however, the limit is not known and thus the question not easy to answer. It turns out that the Cauchy-property of a sequence is not only necessary but also sufficient. That is, every convergent Cauchy sequence is convergent (sufficient) and every convergent sequence is a Cauchy sequence (necessary).
Note that every Cauchy sequence is bounded. To see this set , then there is a
:
and thus
for all
. This means that all points
with
lies within a ball of radius 1 with
as its center.
Theorem 3.2 (Cauchy Sequences & Convergence):
In an Euclidean space every Cauchy sequence is convergent.
Proof: Let be a Cauchy sequence in
and let
be the range of the sequence. If
is finite, then all except a finite number of the terms
are equal and hence
converges to this common value.
Now suppose is infinite. We use the Balzano-Weierstrass Theorem to show that
has an accumulation point
, and then we show that
converges to
. First, recall that each Cauchy sequence is bounded. Hence, since
is infinite there must be an accumulation point
according to the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.
Now let , then there exist a
such that
whenever
. Hence, if
we have
,
so .
Let us furthermore connect the concepts of metric spaces and Cauchy sequences.
Definition 3.3: (Complete Metric Space & Banach Space)
A metric space is called complete (or a Cauchy space) if every Cauchy sequence of points in
has a limit that is also in
.
A Banach space is a complete normed vector space, i.e. a real or complex vector space on which a norm is defined.
Complete and Banach space will become important in Functional Analysis, for instance.
One-Sided Limit of a Function
In this section it is about the limit of a sequence that is mapped via a function to a corresponding sequence of the range. As mentioned before, this concept is closely related to continuity. Let denote the standard metric space on the real line with
and
.
Consider the Heaviside function as shown below. In the one-dimensional metric space there are only two ways to approach a certain point
on the real line. For instance, the point
can be either be approached from the negative (denoted by
) or from the positive (denoted by
) part of the real line. Sometimes this is stated as the limit
is approached “from the left/righ” or “from below/above”.

The Heaviside function does not have a limit at , because if you approach 0 from positive numbers the value is 1 while if you approach from negative numbers the value is 0. As we know, the limit needs to be unique if it exists.
Hence, by writing the left-sided limit
(6)
we mean that for every real number , there is a
, such that
(7)
Left-sided means that the -value increases on the real axis and approaches from the left to the limit point
. Hence,
is positive.
Accordingly, by writing the right-sided limit
(8)
we mean that for every real number , there is a
, such that
(9)
Right-sided means that the -value decreases on the real axis and approaches from the right to the limit point
. Hence,
is positive.
Consider that the left-sided and right-sided limits are just the restricted functions, where the domain is constrained to the “right-hand side” or “left-hand side” of the domain relative to its limit point .
That is, for being the metric space the left-sided and the right-sided domains are
and
, respectively. If we then consider the limit of the restricted functions
and
, we get an equivalent to the definitions above.
Having said that, it is clear that all the rules and principles also apply to this type of convergence. In particular, this type will be of interest in the context of continuity.
Literature:
[1]
[2]
[3]